Built From Primary Records · Sources Named on Every Story · Corrections Noted On-Page · Editorial Policy

El Dorado County woman sentenced for embezzling $300,000 from family trust

Teresa Piper of El Dorado County was sentenced after pleading guilty to felony embezzlement involving a family trust. The court ordered her to repay $341,962.71—more than the $300,000 stated in the headline. A judge sentenced Piper on July 31, 2026, to 120 days in county jail and two years of probation, according to FOX40/Nexstar's report.

Table of Contents

How did Piper gain control of the trust?

Piper became the successor trustee after both parents died. A successor trustee is the person designated to manage a trust when the previous trustee can no longer serve.

The family trust had six beneficiaries. As trustee, Piper controlled assets intended to be managed for their benefit.

Advertisement

What did prosecutors say happened?

Prosecutors said Piper accessed equity in property owned by the trust and used the money for personal purposes. The misconduct continued for about a decade, according to the El Dorado county District Attorney's Office, as reported by FOX40/Nexstar.

The criminal case was filed on July 8, 2024. The District Attorney's Special Prosecutions Unit handled the prosecution.

📨 Get Free California Guides Alerts

Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime

What sentence did the court impose?

Piper pleaded guilty to one felony count of embezzlement. Her sentence included: Restitution is money a court orders a convicted person to pay for losses caused by the crime. Here, the order identifies what Piper owes the trust.

  • 120 days in county jail
  • Two years of probation
  • $341,962.71 in restitution to the trust

Has the family trust recovered the money?

The available reporting establishes that the court ordered restitution. It does not establish that the trust or its six beneficiaries have already received the full $341,962.71. A restitution judgment and successful collection are separate outcomes.

Anyone following the case should distinguish the amount ordered from the amount ultimately paid. Beneficiaries seeking an update should look for records that specifically address payments or collection. The reported sentencing order alone does not answer that question.


You Might Also Like

Owed money from a settlement? Check what is open at OpenClassActions.com. Caring for someone with dementia? Find practical guides at HelpDementia.com. Working out a skin routine? Evidence-based answers at AcneAdvocate.com. Forgot the name of a movie? Identify it at FindThisMovie.com. Was your data exposed? Track active breaches at DataBreachRadar.com.

We use cookies to run this site, measure how it’s used, and show ads. Choose “Essentials only” to limit cookies to what the site needs to work. Privacy Policy.